
Legal Update
Key Amendments to the Business Names Act and Companies Act under the Bill Supplement Written Laws
(Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2026
Introduction
The Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2026 proposes significant reforms to Tanzania's corporate legal framework, particularly affecting the Business Names Act (Cap. 213) and the Companies Act (Cap. 212).
The proposed amendments indicate a clear policy direction aimed at:
• enhancing transparency in business ownership,
• strengthening regulatory oversight, and
• aligning with international Anti-Money Laundering (AML) standards.
This update provides an analysis of the key proposed changes and their potential implications for businesses, professionals, and corporate stakeholders.
1. Amendments to the Business Names Act (Cap. 213)
1.1. Introduction of Designated Non-Financial Business Professionals
The Bill proposes to introduce a new category of regulated persons referred to as “designated non-financial business professionals”, including:
• Advocates, notaries, and other legal professionals
• Accountants
• Real estate agents
• Dealers in precious metals and stones
• Company service providers
• Casino operators
Implication
If enacted, this amendment would significantly broaden the regulatory scope of the Act by bringing previously less-regulated professions within the compliance framework, particularly for AML purposes.
1.2. Expansion of Registration and Disclosure Requirements
The Bill proposes to amend Section 6(1)(d) to require disclosure not only of beneficial owners but also of designated non-financial business professionals involved in the business.
Implication
If the Bill is passed, businesses would be required to:
• disclose additional categories of associated persons; and
• ensure internal records reflect these expanded disclosure obligations.
1.3. Integration with Anti-Money Laundering Framework
The proposed amendment to Section 21 seeks to introduce a new subsection incorporating “reporting persons” as defined under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. If enacted, this means that reporting persons will be able to access information held by the Registrar about beneficial owners of a business.
Implication
This will create a direct legal link between business name registration requirements and AML reporting obligations.
2. Amendments to the Companies Act (Cap. 212)
The proposed amendments under the Bill are extensive and, if enacted, would introduce significant structural reforms to the Companies Act, particularly in relation to corporate governance, compliance requirements, and regulatory oversight.
2.1. Regulation of Nominee Arrangements
The Bill proposed to introduce the definitions for:
• Nominee - means a person instructed by the nominator to act on his behalf in a certain capacity regarding a company;
• Nominator - means a person who issues instruction directly or indirectly to a nominee to act on his behalf in the capacity of a director or a shareholder;
• Nominee Director - means a person who routinely exercises a function of the director in the company on behalf of, and subject to the direct or indirect instructions of the nominator;
• Nominee Shareholder - means a person who exercises voting rights and other rights ancillary to it according to the instructions of the nominator or receives dividend on behalf of the nominator.
Implication
If enacted, this would formally recognise and regulate nominee arrangements, which have historically been used to obscure beneficial ownership. Companies would likely be required to:
• identify nominee relationships; and
• maintain records of underlying controllers.
2.2. Mandatory Record-Keeping of Nominee Structures
It is proposed that Section 15(2) be amended by adding paragraph (b) to require Companies to:
• maintain accurate and up-to-date records of nominee directors and shareholders;
• include nominee details in statutory registers; and
• comply with prescribed regulatory requirements.
Additionally, the Registrar will maintain a central register of nominee directors and shareholders.
Implication
This would enhance transparency in ownership structures and reduce anonymity in corporate control.
2.3. Reintroduction of Specific Objects Requirement
The Bill proposes to repeal and replace Section 8 to require companies to state specific objects in their memorandum.
Implication
If enacted, this would reverse the current flexibility allowing companies to operate with broad or unrestricted objects and would instead limit companies to defined business activities.
2.4. Stricter Enforcement on Company Names
The Bill proposed to introduce a new enforcement mechanism under Section 33(2) that if a company is mistakenly registered with a name that is too similar to another existing company, the Registrar can require a name change (usually within 6 weeks or an additional extended time as the Registrar allows or sees fit).
With this new proposed clause which is added as subsection (5):
• If the company fails to change its name within the required period, it will:
â—¦ Lose its registration status, and
â—¦ Be struck off the register (i.e., effectively cease to exist as a legal entity).
Implication
This would significantly strengthen enforcement, making non-compliance with name change directives potentially fatal to a company's legal existence.
2.5. Contents of Annual Returns
The Bill proposed to amend section 133(5) to include paragraph (b) to require additional disclosure of the number of paid up and unpaid shares in the annual returns.
Implication
This would transform annual returns into a more detailed disclosure tool, enhancing transparency and regulatory oversight.
2.6. Enhanced Beneficial Ownership Disclosure
The Bill proposes to expand beneficial ownership disclosure requirements to include:
• identification details
• contact information
• nature of ownership interest
• politically exposed person (PEP) status
Implication
If enacted, companies would be required to collect, verify, and continuously update detailed beneficial ownership information.
2.7. Expanded Powers of the Registrar
The Bill proposes to grant the Registrar authority to:
• inspect company records at any time;
• conduct inspections with or without notice; and
• require full cooperation from companies.
Implication
This would shift the compliance framework from a passive filing system to a more active enforcement regime.
2.8. New Requirements for Foreign Companies
The Bill proposes that foreign companies comply with enhanced disclosure requirements within a specified period (e.g., six months from commencement).
Implication
This would increase regulatory scrutiny of foreign entities operating in Tanzania.
Conclusion
The proposed amendments under the Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill, 2026 signal a significant shift towards a more transparent, compliance-driven, and enforcement-oriented corporate regulatory framework.
If enacted, these reforms would impose more stringent disclosure and compliance obligations on businesses, while enhancing the powers of the Registrar and strengthening oversight mechanisms.
Businesses and stakeholders are therefore advised to monitor the progress of the Bill closely and begin assessing the potential impact of these proposed changes to ensure timely compliance should the amendments come into force.
Author
Grace Mahuza
Corporate Associate
grace.mahuza@extentadvisory.co.tz
Key Contact
For further information, kindly reach the contact below
Neema Magimba
Managing Partner
neema.magimba@extentadvisory.co.tz
Disclaimer
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is intended as a guide only. Professional advice should be taken before any course of action is pursued. The information presented here is offered free of charge and, accordingly, ECA takes no responsibility for any loss occasioned by the use of the information presented here for whatever reason.
We will communicate any subsequent material changes via our client update and newsletter service and also on our website.
Extent Corporate Advisory (ECA), 7th Floor Tanzanite Park, Victoria Area, New Bagamoyo Road, P.O. Box 75211, Dar es Salaam - Tanzania.

A trademark cannot escape a likelihood-of-confusion inquiry by being carved into pieces. In a Ruling delivered on 26 June 2026, the Deputy Registrar of Trade and Service Marks at the Business Registration and Licensing Agency (BRELA) refused registration of the trademark “MO CLEANSOFT” (and logo), Application No. TZ/T/2019/532 in Class 3, upholding an opposition brought by Guangzhou Sunda International Trading Company Limited, the registered proprietor of the trademark “KLEESOFT” in Tanzania.

The Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2026 (Bill) proposes significant reforms to Tanzania's IP regime under the Trade and Service Marks Act (Cap. 326) and the Patents (Registration) Act (Cap. 217). On the trademark side, the Bill introduces recognition of ARIPO registrations designating Tanzania (new section 28A), statutory protection of well-known marks even without local business or goodwill (new section 19A), and express provision for collective and certification marks (sections 16A and 16B). On the patent side, it proposes ministerial power to temporarily exclude certain inventions from patentability for up to ten years, a 20-year patent term from the filing date, and extension of utility certificates from seven to ten years. If enacted, rights holders are advised to review their trademark and patent portfolios, their approach to ARIPO designations and well-known mark protection, and any pending filings that may be affected.